Open the public sites. Inspect archives, detail pages and mobile paths in production — not a theme shop collage.
A polished homepage screenshot proves you hired a designer. It does not prove the catalogue still works after the third content dump. These links open public websites. Follow a record. Break the path on a phone. If the system collapses into a blog with filters, you will see it.
Related live systems
Three publishing models that already ship
Different markets. Different content models. Same rule: open the external site and judge the publishing system, not the sales deck.
promosystem.net
iGaming / releases
Slot release catalogue
A release-led catalogue that separates what is coming from what just went live, then keeps each game connected to specs, providers and editorial context. A flat “new slots” page with a date stamp is not the same thing.
A US-facing catalogue where games, providers, casino layers and availability-aware content stay connected. If your “US site” is a European theme with dollars glued on, you already know how that ends.
Fixtures, match context, predictions, live odds, bookmaker comparison and editorial in one publishing path. A predictions blog with a widgets graveyard is not a platform.
Colour is cheap. The proof is whether an archive, a detail page and the next commercial step still belong to the same system after you click twice.
01
Structure
Dates, providers, competitions, teams and content types should open useful routes through a growing archive. If discovery dies after the homepage carousel, the architecture already failed.
Routes02
Publishing depth
Move from cards into detail pages and supporting editorial. Specs, relationships and context have to survive. Flattening every record into “another post” is how catalogues rot.
Depth03
Mobile continuity
Open the same paths on a phone. Filters, cards and calls to action should keep the task intact. A shrunk desktop layout with a hamburger and hope is not continuity.
Mobile
Read this before you assume
What these links are — and are not
These are related live projects used to show production capability. Independent sites. Own markets. Own editorial and commercial rules. Linking to them is not an offer of gambling services on this studio site, and it does not mean every visible page was delivered as a client commission. If you need a case-study fairy tale where every pixel is “client work”, look elsewhere.
A live example can prove the foundation. Your brief still decides market, content model, data access, visual direction and the workflows you will actually run. Cloning a demo URL is not a scope.
Public websites change over time. Screens, content and available features may differ from the original delivery as each project continues to publish and operate.
FAQ
Are these live websites or design mockups?
They are public websites. Open each external link to inspect the current catalogue, archive, detail-page and editorial experience.
Are all three websites client projects?
They are related live systems used to demonstrate production capabilities. We do not describe every site or every visible update as a client commission.
Can you reproduce one of these websites exactly?
No. A new project can use the relevant production foundation, but its brand, market, content model and agreed scope determine the delivered design and features.
Do the demos expose the internal data sources and automation?
No. They demonstrate public output. Credentials, source-specific mappings, prompts and operational implementation details remain private.
Why might a live site differ from the description here?
A live publishing project keeps changing after launch. Its owners can add content, adjust layouts and enable or remove features over time.
